Climate-energy bill cost for consumers: up to $146 a year

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

A stalled climate-energy bill in the Senate got a boost Tuesday from federal regulators who reported it would not be too costly, then from President Obama.

“The transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of jobs – but only if we accelerate that transition,” Mr. Obama said in his Oval Office speech. He touted a “strong and comprehensive energy and climate bill – a bill that finally makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America’s businesses.”

That’s been the billion-dollar question surrounding climate legislation: How much will it cost?

The Environmental Protection Agency answered that question earlier Tuesday in a much-anticipated economic analysis. The climate-energy legislation that’s sponsored by Sens. John Kerry (D) of Massachusetts and Joseph Lieberman (I) of Connecticut would have a “relatively modest [economic] impact” on the US public, the EPA’s models showed.

The bill, which includes a market-based “cap and trade” mechanism to put a price on carbon emissions from US smokestack emitters, would hike energy costs for both businesses and consumers. But with rebates for consumers in the plan, as well as other factors, the overall cost to American households would be $79 to $146 annually, the EPA found.

Continue Reading at CSMonitor.com.

You might also like

Opinion: Obama’s energy meltdown
The decision by congressional Democrats to not try to pass a major energy bill in this Congress, while...
Kerry unveils climate bill
Kerry, a Democrat, and Senator Joseph Lieberman, an independent, took the wraps off their bill as two...
One out of six cell phone users suffers from “bill shock”
One out of every six mobile phone users have experienced "bill shock"—an unexpected jump in their monthly...
Plan to limit EPA’s regulation of greenhouse gases fails
The US Senate this afternoon defeated a bid to limit federal regulation of greenhouse gases, instead...

Comments


Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement