Government Report on Gulf Oil Spill Stirs Debate

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

The Obama administration’s latest report on the Gulf of Mexico disaster set off a war of words Wednesday among scientists, Gulf Coast residents and political pundits about what to make of the Deepwater Horizon spill and its aftermath.

The report, the subject of an extended White House briefing, claimed that most of the estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil that have leaked into the gulf could be accounted for, that much of it was effectively gone already, and that most of the remaining oil was in a highly diluted form. The implication of the report was that future damage from the oil might be less than had been feared.

That suggestion was not happily received on the Gulf Coast, where people are still coping with the collapse of fishing and tourism and saw the report as fresh evidence that the Obama administration was preparing to abandon them in the same way they felt the Bush administration did after Hurricane Katrina.

Continue Reading at NYTimes.com.

You might also like

Panel warns Gulf oil spill could happen again
A presidential panel is warning that disasters such as last year's massive Gulf oil spill could happen...
BP boss Tony Hayward admits job is on the line over Deepwater oil spill
Tony Hayward, the under-fire chief executive of BP, has admitted for the first time that his job is on...
Obama and BP set for oil-spill showdown
President Barack Obama embarked on a new visit to the Gulf of Mexico on Monday, two days ahead of a crucial...
Dead, oiled birds reported for first time in Texas
Federal authorities responding to the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill say dead birds with oil on them...

Comments


Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement