News > newsflash

Supreme Court: Suspects must say they want to be silent

Reading: Supreme Court: Suspects must say they want to be silent

 Loading ...

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that suspects must explicitly tell police they want to be silent to invoke Miranda protections during criminal interrogations, a decision one dissenting justice said turns defendants’ rights “upside down.”

A right to remain silent and a right to a lawyer are the first of the Miranda rights warnings, which police recite to suspects during arrests and interrogations. But the justices said in a 5-4 decision that suspects must tell police they are going to remain silent to stop an interrogation, just as they must tell police that they want a lawyer.

The ruling comes in a case where a suspect, Van Chester Thompkins, remained mostly silent for a three-hour police interrogation before implicating himself in a Jan. 10, 2000, murder in Southfield, Mich. He appealed his conviction, saying that he invoked his Miranda right to remain silent by remaining silent.

Continue Reading at The Associated Press.

You might also like

Calif. Court: Cops Can Search Texts Without Warrant The California Supreme Court ruled Monday that police do not need a warrant to search a cell phone carried...

Appeals court turns to state on key Prop. 8 issue California's highest court, which has issued three rulings on same-sex marriage in less than seven years,...

N.J. Supreme Court weighs state’s obligations to school funding during recession Wednesday’s long argument over funding New Jersey schools returned to the state Supreme Court, where...

Supreme Court ruling barring aid to terrorist groups: why some lament it The US Supreme Court has put international humanitarian workers on notice that any assistance to a US-designated...